![titles on imovie 10.0.5 content library titles on imovie 10.0.5 content library](https://partsever700.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/5/3/125385134/865899849.png)
“iMovie on steroids!” The backlash was so significant, Conan O’Brien had his editors made a funny spoof video about it. And perhaps the most egregious thing…it looked like iMovie! In fact, that’s what it was called. A whole new paradigm for editing was created. A ton of key professional features were missing. Professional editors and other filmmakers who had made FCP their NLE (non-linear editor) of choice for many years felt like Apple betrayed them.
#TITLES ON IMOVIE 10.0.5 CONTENT LIBRARY PRO#
Then in the spring of 2011 Apple released Final Cut Pro X (FCPX) and the response was disastrous. You newbies don’t know how easy you have it! When I first took video production, this was the kind of system I had to edit on. And I, like many FCP editors, were waiting with bated breath for Apple to release an update. For the past eleven years I’ve been a die-hard FCP user. Over the years since then I’ve used Media 100, iMovie, and eventually Final Cut Pro 1.0. Back then we used LINEAR, tape to tape editors. I first took film and video production courses the summer of 1992. But, there is just enough commentary to satisfy the creative in you as well. Will FCPX be a good choice for your business or career as a filmmaker. Those of you who know me and this blog know that I like to get down to brass tacks and not let personal feelings get in the way of making a good decision for your BUSINESS.
![titles on imovie 10.0.5 content library titles on imovie 10.0.5 content library](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WWvOdldZkG8/maxresdefault.jpg)
Just a sincere desire to help the industry. I have no financial incentive whatsoever.
#TITLES ON IMOVIE 10.0.5 CONTENT LIBRARY HOW TO#
I wrote this review because a lot of reviews I’ve read were either passionate filmmakers pissed off (therefore biased against writing an objective review), veteran editors who have a financial incentive for you to get FCPX, or objective journalists who, although they liked the program, didn’t really learn how to use it properly. This post is a response to what has been a hot topic of debate in the editing world: namely, is FCPX a viable NLE for the professional. This is NOT meant to be a comparison review. Second, a number of people have commented that I don’t compare FCPX to other NLEs. Editor’s Note: This is part 1 of a 3-part series I plan to write on FCPX.